Pay twice as much, but only get 1.7 times the usage—that's the core claim behind a class action lawsuit a group of Claude users has filed. According to The Verge, a class action complaint filed on September 8 accuses Anthropic of failing to clearly disclose the actual usage limits when marketing its Max subscription plans.
When Anthropic launched Claude Max in April 2025, the official pitch was that paying $100/month would get you "5x more" usage than the Pro plan, while $200/month would get you "20x more." By comparison, Claude Pro starts at as low as $17/month with an annual plan. Anthropic positioned Max as "for users who rely on Claude throughout the day."
The problem lies in how the math works. The complaint states that Anthropic's advertised multipliers only applied to the per-session usage cap, which resets every five hours—but Max users are actually subject to a separate "weekly usage cap" as well, a rule that wasn't added until August 2025, months after Max launched. Once you factor in the weekly cap, the 20x plan—which should offer 4x more usage than the 5x plan—actually only delivers 1.7 times more, despite costing twice as much.






